Hello, I have a autohelm 50 radar unit on my 1992 Catalina 36 which is mounted on the mast about 3 feet above the spreader. It seems to read OK at long distances but not so good at close range. Should I move it below the spreader or put a shim under it to pan lower?  (what abouts the old holes?) I have the mast off the boat for the winter, so now is the time to do it. I just bought the boat and sailed it from Lake Michigan to Lake Superior (Apostle Islands) last summer.     Any input helpful, thank you, Dave

Views: 400

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You may have to choose in what range you want to optimize the radar. If above 6 miles range, keep it where it is in the mast, if you are more interested in the area below 3 miles, move it to a stern pole and put in a cradle. I have mine at the stern on my SO37, and works like a wonder in the closest range. Even used it for anchoring at night in crowded anchorages to get exact distances to other boats. However above 6 miles, not that good. When tracking squalls and bad weather at max range it is excellent. Do a rough calculation with beam-with, mounting height, and you may see how far from the boat the beam 'hits' the water. But as you mentioned, you may correct it by putting a wedge under the antenna and direct it down. Even mast rake may come into play.

Hello Dave,

 I'm afraid I don't have much information to offer up on the AH ST50 Plus radar system as it has been discontinued and de-supported many years ago. I did come across a manual that I have posted to this thread. 

 Thx, to Morton for offering up his valuable insight.

Attachments:

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Events

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to Kurtis Morin's discussion No Navigation Data
"Kurtis, Your system list appears to be incomplete.  Like most chartplotting products, RayTech software requires GPS sensor to navigate ... no GPS sensor appears within your equipment list.   Is there is a GPS sensor and/or additional…"
1 hour ago
Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to Randy Rice's discussion Mercury Optimax engine interface
"Welcome to the Raymarine Technical Forum Tom, The first question which you will need to address is whether your engine system features SmartCraft technology.  Accordingly, it is recommended that you seek this information from Mercury Marine.…"
1 hour ago
Profile IconMarcio Bernik, Ralph Morganstern, Mike McCargar and 4 more joined Raymarine Technical Forum
1 hour ago
Kurtis Morin posted a discussion

No Navigation Data

My problem at the moment occurs when I place a go to cursor and then press "Track" on the Auto pilot control. If I then chose a new go to cursor like when the first one is reached I get a message on the Auto pilot control that says "No Navigation Data"My system:EV-1 AutopilotRayTech 6.2 software on Windows 7Laptop connected to Raymarine network via E85001 InterfaceIf I shut down the RayTech software and reboot the laptop I can then set a go to cursor and press "Track" again and it will work but…See More
1 hour ago
Randy Rice posted a discussion

Mercury Optimax engine interface

I have a new e7D.  Am I able to interface it with my 2000 Mercury Optimax outboard in order to receive engine data ?See More
1 hour ago
Edward J Durski posted a discussion

Apelco vhf-4500

This radio is in need of the on-off switch. Are they available . May be a circuit board with the squelch control also. Serial 211890See More
1 hour ago
Gary Carr posted a status
"my heading on the autopilot is 180 off boat compass heading"
9 hours ago
Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to Richard Scarinzi's discussion b744v connector
"You're welcome."
11 hours ago
Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to Larry Mainoski's discussion A78 Operation
"You're welcome."
11 hours ago
Richard Scarinzi replied to Richard Scarinzi's discussion b744v connector
"Thank you.  I understand fully.  I looked closer at the schematic for both the Raymarine and Lowrance versions of the B744V and indeed there is a wiring difference and a component difference internal to the transducer.  Specifically…"
14 hours ago
Larry Mainoski replied to Larry Mainoski's discussion A78 Operation
"Appreciate the answers. That's a lot of work on your part. Will refer to these answers when I can make time to get back on board in the near future."
15 hours ago
alejandro Zarich replied to alejandro Zarich's discussion i60 close haul working randomly
"I checked today and the failure persist. Once the system is powered on, I have to unplug the seatalkng cable and replug it to make the I60 work. If I do not do that the the small display under the needle displays -- and the needle does nothing.…"
16 hours ago
Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to Steven Tello's discussion A65 Chartplotter "No Fix" Question
"Bob, You're welcome."
16 hours ago
Bob Billeci replied to Steven Tello's discussion A65 Chartplotter "No Fix" Question
"That's what I needed to know, thanks!"
16 hours ago
Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to John Tyson's discussion Depth sounder
"John, Should a new a/c/e/gS-Series MFD be installed onboard, then it may be interfaced to a CP450C.  Base upon the depth of operation and features which you are seeking to detect, high receive sensitivity transducers like the R109LM…"
16 hours ago
Moderator - Raymarine, US replied to Steven Tello's discussion A65 Chartplotter "No Fix" Question
"Bob, Any GPS sensor other than a Raystar 12 or Raystar 125 (latter requires a software update to the MFD) will need to be interfaced to a 12VDC power circuit and to the NMEA 0183 input leads of the MFD's NMEA 0183 Cable."
17 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Moderator - Raymarine, US.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service